Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
Home
  • About us
    • Introducing UUK
    • Our members
    • Careers
      • Vacancies
      • What it's like to work at UUK
      • An inclusive, diverse place to work
    • Our history
    • People
    • Governance, annual reports and accounts
      • Articles of Association
      • Our Board
      • Membership criteria
      • Annual reports and accounts
    • Who we work with
    • Our home: Woburn House
  • Topics
    • Teaching, learning and quality
      • Quality and standards
      • Regulation
      • Ways of learning
      • Working with employers
      • Freedom of speech
    • Funding, finance and operations
      • Security and risk
      • University funding
      • Pensions
    • Impact of universities
      • Communities and social responsibility
      • Discoveries, inventions and global challenges
      • Skills and economy
      • Transforming people’s lives
    • Research and innovation
      • Innovation and big ideas
      • Knowledge exchange
      • Research and funding
      • Research standards, ethics and culture
    • Health and wellbeing
      • Mental health
      • Suicide prevention
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
      • Improving social mobility
      • Opportunities after graduation
      • Safe and inclusive campuses
      • Student success
    • Students
      • Admissions
      • Student finance
      • Student support
      • Student voices and experiences
    • Climate and sustainability
    • International
      • International experience and mobility
      • International research collaboration
      • International staff and students
      • Transnational education
      • Ukraine
  • What we do
    • Policy and research
      • Policy: an overview
      • Publications
      • Policy & Research team
    • Supporting our members
      • What we do for our members
      • Member benefits
      • Supporting vice-chancellors
      • Members' meetings and conference
      • Specialist Institutions Forum
      • Member services team
    • Creating a voice for our members
      • An overview
      • Campaigns
        • #TwinForHope
          • The campaign
          • Background
          • Our impact
        • Getting Results
          • About the campaign
          • Levelling up
          • The analysis behind the campaign
          • Case studies
        • Made At Uni
          • About the campaign
          • Climate Action
          • Creative Sparks
          • Energising Places
        • Our past campaigns
          • We Are Together
          • Support study abroad
      • Events
        • Speak at our events
        • Sponsorship
        • Events team
      • Media releases
      • Media team
      • Communications team
    • International
    • Work in parliament
      • Political affairs: an overview
      • All-Party Parliamentary University Group
      • Parliamentary briefings and submissions
      • Political Affairs Network
  • Latest
    • News
    • Events
      • Past Events
    • Insights and analysis
    • Watch past events
  • Media
  • Events
  • International

Search

  • - Any -
  • Covid
  • Equality, diversity and inclusion
  • Funding, finance and operations
  • Health and wellbeing
  • Impact of universities
  • International
  • Research and innovation
  • Students
  • Sustainability and climate
  • Teaching, learning and quality
  • - Any -
  • UUKi Blog
  • UUKi Insights
  • Insights and analysis
  • Media releases
  • News
  • Publications
  • UUKi Publications
  • UUKi News
  • - Any -
  • Campaign
  • Event
  • Basic page
  • Profile
  • Newest first
  • Oldest first
  • A -> Z
  • Z -> A
  • Relevance

Or browse by topic

  • Teaching, learning and quality
  • Funding, finance and operations
  • Impact of universities
  • Research and innovation
  • Health and wellbeing
  • Equality, diversity and inclusion
  • Students
  • Climate and sustainability
  • International

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. What we do
  3. Policy and research
  4. Publications
  5. Closing the gap: three years on

What works?

Two people writing on a board

Our recommendations: What works?

Universities need to build a university-wide understanding of what works to remove ethnicity degree-awarding gaps, so that they can keep working to close the gap in the long term.

Evaluation of what works should be planned into university-wide and local approaches to removing awarding gaps.

For example, universities could:

  • assess the success of activities aiming to remove ethnicity awarding gaps
  • use existing resources, such as those provided by Transforming Access and Student Outcomes in Higher Education (TASO)
  • collaborate with university partners to share examples of successful (and less successful) work across the sector – opportunities could include regional partnerships or work within university mission groups
  • keep researching the impact of measures taken during the Covid-19 pandemic on ethnicity awarding gaps

What’s changed since 2019?

Some universities are evaluating at least some of their activity to remove ethnicity awarding gaps, but there’s still a long way to go to make sure evaluation is being effectively and consistently used within universities and across the sector.

The issue of ethnicity awarding gaps is complicated. Universities are doing a lot of work in this area, which can make it challenging to link up impact of this work to a particular practice or intervention.

That’s why it’s so important to have a coordinated, university-wide approach to tackling ethnicity awarding gaps. Evaluation needs to be central to university action plans, and there needs to be quality assurance from the very start.

Universities and organisations across the sector need to work together to share good practice, consider whether they’re doing enough to make evaluation findings accessible, and make full use of existing resources.

Case study

Student advisory panel for BAME students at Edge Hill University

The Widening Access and Participation Team at Edge Hill University put together a student advisory panel for Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Students in 2020/21 to inform the design and delivery of a wide range of university initiatives.

The panel's contributions have already and will continue to lead change that positively impacts students from underrepresented backgrounds. This is crucial in improving outcomes for students’ attainment, continuation and progression into employment or further study.

Working together, we want to take action on issues such as the degree awarding gap, while also making sure this information is accessible and communicated to the student community. The panel is an open opportunity for students to get involved with and we’ve already made good progress in this academic year.

Claire Beerjaraz

Student, Edge Hill University

Did the Covid-19 pandemic help with closing the gap?

There’s still a lot of work being done to explore the impact of the pandemic, and the changes universities made in response to the pandemic restrictions on ethnicity awarding gaps.

During the significant uncertainty and disruption we have all faced, many universities increased flexibility in terms of support or assessment methods. For example, universities may have tailored support services to individual needs, introduced no-detriment policies, or switched from traditional ‘closed book’ exams to online assessments.

Universities are continuing to develop a shared understanding of which changes have had a positive impact on reducing ethnicity degree-awarding gaps, while maintaining quality and standards, with many intending to keep certain practices where the evidence of a positive impact is strong. We will work to help gather this evidence and share good practice.

What did university staff say?

  • 54% of those surveyed said that they evaluate all or most of their activities to remove ethnicity awarding gaps. 9% evaluated very few or no activities.
  • Over half (54%) believe the reduction in ethnicity awarding gaps seen across universities in 2019/20 is linked to changes in assessment practices and the use of no-detriment policies during the pandemic.
Previous
Back to start

Closing the gap: three years on

  • Introduction
  • Data
  • Strong leadership
  • Conversations about race and culture
  • Racially diverse and inclusive communities
  • Evidence and analysis
  • What works?

Share

  • Tweet this
  • Share on facebook
  • Share linkedin
Back to top
Home

Woburn House, 20 Tavistock Square,
London, WC1H 9HQ
-
+44(0)20 7419 4111
info@universitiesuk.ac.uk

  • About us
    • Introducing UUK
    • Our members
    • Careers
    • Our history
    • People
    • Governance, annual reports and accounts
    • Who we work with
    • Our home: Woburn House
  • Topics
    • Teaching, learning and quality
    • Funding, finance and operations
    • Impact of universities
    • Research and innovation
    • Health and wellbeing
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Students
    • Climate and sustainability
    • International
  • What we do
    • Policy and research
    • Supporting our members
    • Creating a voice for our members
    • International
    • Work in parliament
  • Latest
    • News
    • Events
    • Insights and analysis
    • Watch past events
  • Contact us
  • Privacy notice
  • Cookies
  • Accessibility
  • Newsletter

© Copyright Universities UK

Universities UK registered Charity No. 1001127. A Company limited by guarantee and registered in England and Wales Company No. 2517018.
Registered Office: Woburn House, 20 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HQ

  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on Facebook

Site by Effusion