Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
Home
  • About us
    • Introducing UUK
    • Our members
    • Careers
      • Vacancies
      • What it's like to work at UUK
      • An inclusive, diverse place to work
    • Our history
    • People
    • Governance, annual reports and accounts
      • Articles of Association
      • Our Board
      • Membership criteria
      • Annual reports and accounts
    • Who we work with
    • Our home: Woburn House
  • Topics
    • Teaching, learning and quality
      • Quality and standards
      • Regulation
      • Ways of learning
      • Working with employers
      • Freedom of speech
    • Funding, finance and operations
      • Security and risk
      • University funding
      • Pensions
    • Impact of universities
      • Communities and social responsibility
      • Discoveries, inventions and global challenges
      • Skills and economy
      • Transforming people’s lives
    • Research and innovation
      • Innovation and big ideas
      • Knowledge exchange
      • Research and funding
      • Research standards, ethics and culture
    • Health and wellbeing
      • Mental health
      • Suicide prevention
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
      • Improving social mobility
      • Opportunities after graduation
      • Safe and inclusive campuses
      • Student success
    • Students
      • Admissions
      • Student finance
      • Student support
      • Student voices and experiences
    • Climate and sustainability
    • International
      • International experience and mobility
      • International research collaboration
      • International staff and students
      • Ukraine
  • What we do
    • Policy and research
      • Policy: an overview
      • Publications
      • Policy & Research team
    • Supporting our members
      • What we do for our members
      • Member benefits
      • Supporting vice-chancellors
      • Members' meetings and conference
      • Specialist Institutions Forum
      • Member services team
    • Creating a voice for our members
      • An overview
      • Campaigns
        • #TwinForHope
          • The campaign
          • Background
          • Our impact
        • Getting Results
          • About the campaign
          • Levelling up
          • The analysis behind the campaign
          • Case studies
        • Made At Uni
          • About the campaign
          • Climate Action
          • Creative Sparks
          • Energising Places
        • Our past campaigns
          • We Are Together
          • Support study abroad
      • Events
        • Speak at our events
        • Sponsorship
        • Events team
      • Media releases
      • Media team
      • Communications team
    • International
    • Work in parliament
      • Political affairs: an overview
      • All-Party Parliamentary University Group
      • Parliamentary briefings and submissions
      • Political Affairs Network
  • Latest
    • News
    • Events
      • Past events
    • Insights and analysis
    • Newsletter
    • Podcasts
    • Publications
    • Watch past events
  • Media
  • Events
  • International

Search

  • - Any -
  • Covid
  • Equality, diversity and inclusion
  • Funding, finance and operations
  • Health and wellbeing
  • Impact of universities
  • International
  • Research and innovation
  • Students
  • Sustainability and climate
  • Teaching, learning and quality
  • - Any -
  • UUKi Blog
  • UUKi Insights
  • Insights and analysis
  • Media releases
  • News
  • Publications
  • UUKi Publications
  • UUKi News
  • - Any -
  • Campaign
  • Event
  • Basic page
  • Profile
  • Newest first
  • Oldest first
  • A -> Z
  • Z -> A
  • Relevance

Or browse by topic

  • Teaching, learning and quality
  • Funding, finance and operations
  • Impact of universities
  • Research and innovation
  • Health and wellbeing
  • Equality, diversity and inclusion
  • Students
  • Climate and sustainability
  • International

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. What we do
  3. Policy and research
  4. Publications
  5. Closing the gap: three years on

Introduction

Man with Glasses

The ethnicity degree awarding gap at universities means that white students are more likely to be awarded top grades in their degrees than Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) students.

Our 2019 Closing the gap report urged universities to do more to close the awarding gap between white and BAME students.

Pdf

Closing the gap: three years on

Download pdf version of the publication

We’ve worked with students’ union representatives and staff to take a look at the awarding gap, three years on.

Why do we need to close the gap?

The gap is a key indicator of racial inequality in the university sector that we must address. It’s an issue that needs long-term solutions and collaboration between people across universities.

8.8
%

The gap between the percentage of white students and BAME students awarded a First or a 2:1 for their degree (2020/21).

18.4
%

The gap between the percentage of white students and Black students awarded a First or 2.1 in their degree (2020/21).

9.5
%

The gap between the percentage of white students and BAME students awarded a First in their degree (2020/21).

In 2019, we called for universities to tackle inequality between students of different ethnicities in the awarding of degrees.

While progress has been made since 2019, there is still a substantial gap between the likelihood of white and BAME students awarded a First or 2:1 in their degree. It’s clear that a student’s ethnicity can significantly affect their degree outcome, even when other factors such as prior attainment are taken into consideration.

For me it is important for everybody to realise that there is a problem. There is a situation, and even if those conversations are very uncomfortable, you have to face them, because without facing them, you're ignoring them, and there's no change.

Denise Morrison

Denise Morrison

Full-time Officer for School of Social Sciences & Social Professions and incoming President, London Met Students’ Union

How did we carry out our research?

We worked with senior university leaders, as well as university staff and students’ unions, to find out what has been successful since 2019, what’s been less successful, and what more needs to be done.

We did this through:

  • an online university survey, with 57 responses from senior leaders in learning, teaching and student experience roles
  • three focus groups with 26 students’ union representatives
  • three focus groups with 25 university staff representatives
  • input from senior university leaders
  • feedback from our conference, Closing ethnicity awarding gaps 2022, attended by 117 individuals from across the sector, including staff and students

We also asked some of these staff, students’ union representatives and students about their personal experiences.

These accounts show how the problem personally affects BAME students and staff, and how staff can work with students to close the gap.

What does the data say?

Data

What does the data tell us about how things have changed since 2019?

  • The gap between white and BAME students being awarded a First or a 2:1 for their degree has reduced from 13.2% for 2018 graduates to 8.8% for 2021 graduates.
  • The gap between white and Black students has seen the biggest reduction. However, the gap between white and Black students being awarded the top grade (a First) for their degree has got worse, standing at 9.5%.  
  • White students are still more likely to be awarded higher grades for their degrees than students of all other ethnicities. 
  • 19% of academic staff with a known ethnicity are BAME. Just 2.5% of academic staff are Black.

How can we close the gap?

University leaders have already committed to removing ethnicity degree-awarding gaps, particularly since we published our original Closing the gap report in 2019.

But universities now need to:

  • prioritise co-production with students, jointly developing and implementing a strategic, whole-university approach to removing the gap
  • ensure there’s accountability for all staff within every academic faculty and every professional services department to work to remove the gap
  • build an understanding of what success looks like and how it can be maintained
Back to start
Data

Closing the gap: three years on

  • Introduction
  • Data
  • Strong leadership
  • Conversations about race and culture
  • Racially diverse and inclusive communities
  • Evidence and analysis
  • What works?

Share

  • Tweet this
  • Share on facebook
  • Share linkedin
Back to top
Home

Woburn House, 20 Tavistock Square,
London, WC1H 9HQ
-
+44(0)20 7419 4111
info@universitiesuk.ac.uk

  • About us
    • Introducing UUK
    • Our members
    • Careers
    • Our history
    • People
    • Governance, annual reports and accounts
    • Who we work with
    • Our home: Woburn House
  • Topics
    • Teaching, learning and quality
    • Funding, finance and operations
    • Impact of universities
    • Research and innovation
    • Health and wellbeing
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Students
    • Climate and sustainability
    • International
  • What we do
    • Policy and research
    • Supporting our members
    • Creating a voice for our members
    • International
    • Work in parliament
  • Latest
    • News
    • Events
    • Insights and analysis
    • Newsletter
    • Podcasts
    • Publications
    • Watch past events
  • Contact us
  • Privacy notice
  • Cookies
  • Accessibility

© Copyright Universities UK

Universities UK a charity registered in England and Wales (1001127) and Scotland (SC052497). A company limited by guarantee and registered in England and Wales Company No. 2517018.
Registered Office: Woburn House, 20 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9HQ.

  • Follow us on Instagram
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on LinkedIn
  • Follow us on Facebook

Site by Effusion