Home > Policy and analysis > Reports > Making it count: how universities are using income from variable fees

Making it count: how universities are using income from variable fees

Report
29 January 2010

Since their introduction in 2006, for the two years for which figures are available, variable tuition fees have brought £1.3 billion1 new income into the higher education sector. This report provides an insight into how this income has been used by English universities. It is based on national data and responses from 62% of English universities to a survey conducted by Universities UK in October 2009.

Key findings

After a long period of decreasing or static funding per student, the new income from variable tuition fees in England,2 combined with increases in funding from other sources, is beginning to make a significant contribution to stabilising the financial position of universities in England, enabling them to invest to improve all aspects of the student experience.

 

Key points include:

  • fee income totalled £451 million in 2006/07 and £878 million in 2007/08;
  • 25% of fee income, or £335 million, was spent on bursaries and outreach over this two-year period;
  • according to the Office for Fair Access, in 2007/08, 205,000 students from lower income and other under-represented groups received a bursary or scholarship;
  • the median student: staff ratio has improved from 17.6 in 2004/05 to 16.8 in 2007/08;
  • there has been significant investment in buildings and infrastructure. 57% of higher education institutions have improved the quality of their estates (excluding accommodation) in this period;
  • the financial health of higher education institutions has also improved by a number of measures, including levels of liquidity and deficit/ surplus. University responses point to clear decisions about using fee income to improve the student experience. Common themes were:
  • improving the physical infrastructure for teaching and learning including new and refurbished lecture rooms, new social learning spaces, IT upgrades and expanded library services;
  • support for learning, including subject ​specific help, study skills support, virtual learning environments, and support in developing skills for employability:
  • investing in the broader package of student services, including expanded careers advisory services, the provision of more social space, new support centres and major new sporting facilities;
  • supporting students in financial terms, including targeted bursaries and scholarships such as regional bursaries, or bursaries to support progression from local schools and colleges;
  • investing in staffing, including improving student: staff ratios, often with an emphasis on particular subject areas, and explicitly linking the decision to do this with improving the student experience.

Comment on IFS research on student loan interest rates and reintroducing maintenance grants

17 November 2017
Response to the new analysis from the IFS looking at options for reducing the interest rate on student loans and reintroducing maintenance grants in England.

Employers propose reforms to ensure USS pension scheme remains sustainable and attractive to members

17 November 2017
Higher education employers are proposing changes to the USS pension scheme to address the scheme's deficit and the significant rise in the cost of future pensions.
HM Treasury

The chancellor’s budget dilemma: four ways universities can help

10 November 2017
UUK's Alistair Jarvis sets out our areas the chancellor should consider when he delivers the budget 2017.

Brighton rock and cough drops: UUK at the party conferences

5 October 2017
Mark Condren, UUK's Political Affairs Officer, highlights key points for universities in recent party conference speeches and fringe events.